Stay Informed:
 Maritime Regulations and Shipping News

As the maritime industry tackles FuelEU Maritime and EU ETS, the business case for Onshore Power Supply (OPS)—also known as shore power...

With the FuelEU Maritime Regulation now in effect, LNG-powered vessels are in a unique position. Their lower greenhouse gas (GHG)...

With the introduction of FuelEU Maritime following the famous EU ETS, shipping companies must make strategic decisions about meeting...

The previous two newsletters touched upon different business cases for compliance with FuelEU Maritime, namely biofuel vs pooling and...

BetterSea Co-Founder Honored for Leadership in Maritime Decarbonization BetterSea is proud to announce that our co-founder, Dr. Gordana...

Throughout recent years, and especially last year, LNG has emerged as a widely used transition fuel, offering lower CO2 emissions compared to other fossil fuels. As described previously, under the FuelEU Maritime Regulation, LNG vessels are at an advantage over other fossil fuel ships due to their lower greenhouse gas intensity. Looking beyond fossil LNG, bio-LNG is already a common surplus generator under FuelEU, especially seen as the enabler of some of the super pools offe

Collaboration Enhances Digital Solutions for FuelEU Maritime Compliance. BetterSea is proud to announce a strategic partnership with...

The new partnership will allow NorthStandard members heavily discounted access to the BetterSea FuelEU Maritime Compliance service,...

As the FuelEU Maritime regulation takes effect, companies must choose between paying the penalty, switching to biofuels, or pooling surplus from over-compliant ships. Each option has significant financial implications. This week, we present a case study comparing real-world costs for a non-compliant vessel, helping companies identify the most cost-effective strategy. Evaluating FuelEU Maritime Compliance Costs Scenario Overview A sample containership consumes 10,000 tonnes of