Stay Informed:
 Maritime Regulations and Shipping News

Last week, the maritime sector was waiting for a turning point. At the extraordinary MEPC83 session, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) was expected to adopt the long-discussed Net Zero Framework (NZF). Instead, following a geopolitical standoff led by the United States and Saudi Arabia, the decision was deferred. The IMO will now revisit the NZF no earlier than October 2026, effectively pushing back the global decarbonisation timeline by at least one to two years.

The regulatory landscape for shipping has never been more dynamic. Three major frameworks will likely dominate the conversation going forward. Let's explore the side effects of these regulations and how they have changed the industry. EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Since its extension to maritime in 2024, the EU Emissions Trading System has changed the way owners and charterers collaborate. What was once siloed consumption data is now the basis for voyage statements, EUA r

FuelEU Maritime compliance brings new commercial challenges. While the regulation defines penalties and created a surplus trading market, it leaves open how owners and charterers should settle costs and benefits in charter parties. The result? A wide range of FuelEU addendums now circulating in the market. In today's newsletter, we shed light on the different settlement options. General Recap: Charter Party Agreements under FuelEU Maritime End of 2024, BIMCO released its stan

BetterSea Launches the World’s First FuelEU Index, Signaling a New Era of Transparency and Trading Confidence

As shipping companies explore the use of biofuels to meet FuelEU Maritime requirements, the question is no longer whether to blend but how to blend. Today’s case study compares two alternative fuel strategies, both using Bio30 blends but based on different fossil components: MGO and HFO. The difference in cost is smaller than many might expect. Understanding Bio30-MGO vs. Bio30-HFO Both scenarios assume a vessel consuming a combination of fuels, namely 3,000 tonnes of MGO, 50

UECC, BetterSea and Veracity by DNV Demonstrate Streamlined, Real-Time FuelEU Maritime ComplianceThrough Trusted Digital Integration

The FuelEU Maritime Regulation and the EU ETS both rely heavily on fuel-level data to determine compliance and reward the uptake of sustainable fuels. Yet as shipping companies begin to implement these requirements, one of the most pressing questions is practical: how should a shipping company demonstrate that a delivered fuel complies with the GHG intensity thresholds or even qualifies as a renewable fuel of non-biological origin (RFNBO)? Proof of Sustainability (PoS) and Pr

Navigating Compliance and Optimization in FuelEU with Biofuels With increasing FuelEU exposure and costs, vessels calling the EU must make every gram of CO₂e count. Today’s case study analyzes a practical voyage scenario involving sustainable biofuels on an EEA-in/outgoing roundtrip. We focus on optimizing FuelEU compliance through fuel allocation. Example 1: Bio30 on EEA-In/Outgoing Roundtrip – The Need for Fuel Stream Separation Consider a vessel that arrives at an EU port,

As shipping companies navigate the complex cost landscape shaped by FuelEU Maritime, understanding the trade-offs between compliance options becomes essential. This week, we revisit the biofuel vs pooling discussion of previous newsletters with a focused case study: a containership on a transatlantic voyage. Voyage Details: Route: New York to Hamburg Speed: 24 knots Duration: ~6 days Fuel Consumption (50%): 200 tonnes MDO + 450 tonnes VLSFO Regulatory Scope: 50% exposure to F